Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Missed one situation for Indexed Properties where we need index access #15251

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 4, 2019
Merged

Missed one situation for Indexed Properties where we need index access #15251

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 4, 2019

Conversation

lajones
Copy link
Contributor

@lajones lajones commented Apr 3, 2019

… instead of member access.

Found a small situation when investigating Shared-Type Entities where I had missed using index access instead of member access. But it's really part of issue #13610 rather than Shared-Type Entities so sending it as a separate PR.

@lajones lajones self-assigned this Apr 3, 2019
@lajones lajones added this to the 3.0.0 milestone Apr 3, 2019
@lajones lajones merged commit 514fda6 into master Apr 4, 2019
@lajones lajones deleted the 190403_IndexedProperties_01 branch April 4, 2019 18:43
@lajones
Copy link
Contributor Author

lajones commented Apr 4, 2019

Thanks, @smitpatel.

@ajcvickers ajcvickers modified the milestones: 3.0.0, 3.0.0-preview6 Jun 5, 2019
@ajcvickers ajcvickers modified the milestones: 3.0.0-preview6, 3.0.0 Nov 11, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@smitpatel smitpatel smitpatel approved these changes

Assignees

@lajones lajones

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
3.0.0
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
3 participants
@lajones @smitpatel @ajcvickers